...where 'because I said so' and 'for your own good' receive a thorough examination.


  

Compassion

clock December 12, 2012 04:01 by author Sean Eckenrod

We all make mistakes.  The more we feel pushed and the more deadlines exist and the more you feel various pressures, the higher the likelihood of those mistakes.  Patience only goes so far at times, even for someone who prides themselves on the non-aggression principle.

That said, my oldest daughter got snapped at by me this morning.  My mistake, my pressure, my fault.  What was interesting is, now 10 and almost 11, she looked at me with compassion.  She knows that is not the norm from me.  When younger, she cower away or sulk or get mad at me.

Now those are all fine things to do and completely acceptable when a parent yells at a child.  Hence, I do not do it (hardly ever anyway).  In addition, I do not punish (no timeouts…ever) nor blackmail (be good and I will….).  When you parent with compassion versus aggression, you hope that the compassion is the thing learned.

So I have to admit a certain pride in seeing her, in the face of my pointless anger, practice compassion and understanding.  It dissolved my anger.

Being compassionate toward an aggressor or in the face of intimidation or when being attacked is a level of empathy almost no one reaches, at least consistently.  I know I fail too often to reach my desired goals in this regard.  Heck, it’s hard enough to stay level headed with normal pressures.

But if you choose to parent with nonviolence, it will pay off and it does work.  Compassion teaches compassion.  Violence teaches violence.  Guilt teaches guilt.  Openness teaches openness. 

Currently rated 1.5 by 132 people

  • Currently 1.492424/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Homework

clock October 18, 2012 00:50 by author Sean Eckenrod

Have you worked with your kids on their homework or observed them doing homework?  Have you had to beg and nag and coerce and blackmail, just to get them to spend 15 minutes on homework?  Is homework a lot of home work?

I would assume, for most, the answer is yes to the above questions.  Now, if that is the flavor and the process of homework, the assumption must be that it is extremely useful and is of the utmost importance to your kid’s world of intellect.

Yes, I just choked as I wrote it, just like you laughed as you read it.  Anyone who has spent time with a kid doing homework knows that they get very little from it and it is often just busy work.  But we fight and nag, and much home misery is created by this demand. 

This causes two questions to pop into my mind.  One, why do parents go along with this and continue to carry water for schools and teachers who demand it?  And second, why in the world would any education professional actually create this situation or think it is useful?

Why do parents do it?  Here are some answers I have heard and my comments.

“Teachers demand it.  What are we going to do?”  This is the old give away of responsibility move.  If you want your kids to be critical thinkers and to not follow the crowd, why would we stop thinking and follow a teacher in mindless obedience?

“Well they need to learn it.”  But you know that doing a task with no heart or mind into it is a waste of time.  A kid will be lucky to remember a fact for the test, let alone integrate it into their intellect.  If you want your kids to be smarter and embrace life to its fullest, why demand that they do things that make their world more boring and make life more unhappy?

“I did homework and look how I turned out.”  This is popular to justify almost anything we do to our kids, but it legitimizes nothing.  In fact, why would we justify a demand like that when we want our kids to be independent thinkers and not simply follow orders?

In reality, most parents will acknowledge the reality of homework but then say ‘meh’.

Why do teachers do it?

While there may be a small percentage of teachers who think the repetition involved is useful, I think most do it to look like they are doing something.  After all, if a teacher does not give homework, then a parent doesn’t see ‘something happening’ with their kids.  This can make for some uncomfortable talks at parent-teacher confabs.  After all, parents are paranoid that their kids are not going to be competitive in the ‘21st century’ so teachers should do ‘everything they can’.  (even something pointless, apparently)

I think teachers are also under pressure from schools to give homework.  This happens for 3 reasons.  One is named above.  Two, administrators need teachers to prep kids for standardized tests (which requires a whole book to explain why that is nearly pointless).  And lastly, and this is the dirty little secret, it gets parents to have skin in the game.

Now what do I mean by that last one?  Well, it means that if you are required to oversee the extension of the school into the home, that means you de facto support the school.  It also means if something goes wrong with your child, a school can point the finger at you.

This is a similar reason to why schools make kids sell cookies and magazines and god knows what else.  The amount of money raised by these things is tiny compared to the massive sums brought in by taxes, so why do schools demand it?

They need the parents to have skin in the game.  They need to blackmail parents by the universal human feelings of responsibility and reciprocity.  If anything goes wrong, then YOU need to do more.  YOU are failing.  After all, a school can only do ‘so much’.  A school tries so hard and we are ‘a team’, right?  A school does everything for a child and all they are asking for is a little cooperation!

I would guess that 90% of homework is an absolute waste of time.  So are we going to question it or continue to make life more unhappy for little to no gain?  If you choose the later, please contact me.  I have some work that needs done and I’m sure you won’t mind doing it for free….

Currently rated 1.5 by 38 people

  • Currently 1.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Syndrome and Sibling Rivalry

clock August 15, 2012 00:29 by author Sean Eckenrod

Syndrome: Oh, I'm real. Real enough to defeat you! And I did it without your precious gifts, your oh-so-special powers. I'll give them heroics. I'll give them the most spectacular heroics the world has ever seen! And when I'm old and I've had my fun, I'll sell my inventions so that *everyone* can have powers. *Everyone* can be super! And when everyone's super... [chuckles evilly] no one will be.

Sibling rivalry can run amuck.  Kids feeling constantly in competition with one another, scorekeeping your action and expenditures.  Watching each other for every little thing they can get mad at each other about.  Bickering and fighting.

You may think that all siblings are this way, but that is not true.  In addition, it does not have to be that way.  The major problem is that the reaction of us parents to comparisons between kids is often the opposite of what it needs to be to diffuse the bomb that is sibling rivalry.

Syndrome (from the Incredibles) gets it, but it seems that far too many people do not.  If you accentuate fairness in numbers and amounts, this is equivalent to accentuating comparison.  Even if what you want is EVERYONE to feel special, the reality is that NO ONE feels special when cosmic fairness is your aim.

Do you get your kids the same gifts or presents or things or gum?  If one gets something does the other child HAVE to get something as well?  If you think that, you are feeding the rivalry, not merely keeping the peace.

It is actually better (and makes kids feel more special) when you rarely buy them stuff at the time.  It is better, if you are giving both kids something at once, to make the items as different as possible.

 

Consider this exchange:

Daughter #1:  You got daughter #2 a toy.  Did you get me anything?

Me:  No, it was her birthday.  You get things on your birthday just different stuff.

Or perhaps:

Daughter #2:  You got daughter 1 a pair of shorts.  Did you get me anything? 

Me:  No, she needed shorts today.  We get stuff when we need them.

Or if I got them both an item:

Daughter #1:  you got me a Polly Pocket and daughter 2 a Lego friend.  Why didn’t you get me a Lego friend?

Me:  Well, daughter 1 really likes those and I noticed you had been playing with a Polly the other day, so I thought it would be a nice surprise.

 

I know some of you may find it hard to believe, but kids can handle those answers.  Second, those answers free them from focusing on the scorecard.  Third, those answers stop you from placing yourself in the middle of a sibling drama.  And lastly, read my final answer above.  That statement actually individualizes each child, showing that you are thinking of each specially.

Accentuating fairness creates, sustains and enhances sibling rivalry.  It can create a situation where nothing is ever good enough because kids don’t feel special.  In order to feel special, they will fight for every penny, nice comment, profession of love, trinket, parcel, widget, bowl of cereal, pencil, dress, or piece of garbage on the face of the earth.  When everybody is equal, no one has special powers.  Remember, Syndrome is the bad guy. 

Add into that our tendency of parents to have favorites, and it is a recipe for warfare. 

I think most parents want to be fair with their kids.  I know I do.  We need to be fair without it being obvious and without it being a focus of events, amounts and outcomes.  Instead, accentuate what is special about each child and allow them to see the other get presents alone, as a special individual in a special situation.  In time, they will be happy for one another versus rivalrous bean counters.

Currently rated 1.6 by 40 people

  • Currently 1.6/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Thanks!

clock July 2, 2012 01:32 by author Sean Eckenrod

It is an honor and privilige to witness those wonderful moments where you see your children being themselves, being confident, and being compassionate.  All were on display at the Jimmy Buffett show last Thursday.

I saw my daughters making balloon animals, being friendly and confident, and having a blast as they also managed to make some 'tips' as well.  They are very proud of themselves and should be.

In the concert, my oldest repeatedly got beach balls for the younger and the youngest toughed it out for the encore even though she got tired.  The three of us worked together to have a great concert, great tailgating and managed to keep the ship between the buoys.  A wonderful time and a wonderful memory.

Currently rated 1.5 by 10 people

  • Currently 1.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Living Vicariously

clock May 3, 2012 00:05 by author Sean Eckenrod

Do we all live vicariously through our children or are we simply trying our best to give them a better life?

Before I had kids, I would admittedly cattily mock the football dad or the stage mom, or anyone who met some stereotype of a parent ‘living through’ their child.  Now that I have been with my daughters for 10 and 7 years, I have realized that perhaps this easy stereotype is not so cut and dried.

You see, almost every parent has a preferred activity which helped give meaning to their life or they lived out an existentially, life-shaping series of events which they think important.  For some parents, it is football.  For others, it is music or academics or swimming or computers or, in my case, benign neglect.  It is like the movie The Breakfast Club.

As you will notice, a lot of the items on the living vicariously list are competitive ‘sports’.  Why do I put sports in quotes? Because most people think of sports as things associated with athletics, but in reality, music can be a sport and academic grades are the biggest competitive sport of all.  In fact with grades, every child is forced to participate in that sport.

For me, living vicariously involves trying to give my daughters tons of free time and space as I had when young.  While this involves not wanting to label them nor turn them into something nor making them my project, I would be lying if I did not acknowledge that I am no different from the sports dad or the stage mom:  I am trying to give the girls something that I found infinitely valuable to my life and my personal development, and something which is in sync with my values.

Am I living vicariously through them?  Well, I would have to admit I probably am.  My values require me to not define them but to try to offer them help as they define themselves.  This is still a construct through which I impose my values on them.

What’s my point?  Be careful how fast you judge others.  Before I had kids or at least ones old enough to be involved in ‘stuff’, it was easy to indict.  Now, I may disagree with another parents ferocity and I may think them wrong in their approach, but I cannot dismiss them with a ‘living vicariously’ derogatory comment.  I have to acknowledge that we all do it.

The benefit of this acknowledgment is that any discussion can then start from an agreeable premise:  we all want what is best for our kids.

Creating our childhood fears in our children

I would like to address something which flys under the radar of normal conversation in this regard.  For all the clichés attached to living vicariously through your kids, there are many parents who say ‘I am going to be more supportive’ or ‘compassionate’ to my kids than my parents were.  I will give them ‘opportunities’ I never had or be more ‘fair’ amongst my children.  I will be better than my parents!

An oddity I have seen over and over can be summed up in a short story I read recently about a father who felt his parents were neglectful in regard to protecting him from a mean dog.  He always thought when he had kids, he would protect them unlike what was done to him.  He would provide for his kids as he was NOT provided for.

That sounds like a pretty simple statement and a nice sentiment.  The problem is that in order for him to allay his child’s fear (HIS actual fear from HIS childhood), he first needed to create the fear in his child.  Apparently, he would take his daughter and put her in uncomfortable, scary situations with a dog or animal (not dangerous, but scary to her), and then take her away from the situation with great compassion.

Is he living vicariously through her?  Absolutely, just not in the way normally thought of.

This story illustrates a fundamental problem of us fixing our childhood problems in our kids.  We first have to create our problems in our kids.  When we do, rather than solving those problems and being compassionate, we create and pass on our very real fears.

Summarized, this could be stated as:  Parents want to offer what was not given to them, but what they pass on is the fears they had.

As my daughters get older, I have seen myself wanting them to see the values I hold dear and sometimes they do, sometimes they do not.  My feelings about these things can be very, very strong, but do they really need to be?  Should they be?  Why does my knee want to jerk sometimes? 

Am I trying to live vicariously through my children?  Most likely, yes.  All of us with our sports, stage, academics, fishing, free time, fear resolutions, and on and on do it.  We should try to remember to consider what are OUR needs and what are our children’s needs.

They are individuals who have their own personal needs.

Currently rated 1.5 by 36 people

  • Currently 1.527778/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5



Sean Eckenrod is a dad, computer geek, investor, and home remodeler trying to be the best father he can.

Tag cloud

    RecentPosts

    Sign in